whswhs (whswhs) wrote in linguaphiles,
whswhs
whswhs
linguaphiles

English grammar: definite article with ordinals

One of my clients for copy editing asked me a question about English grammar: When is the definite article required with ordinals? My first approximation to an answer was that you use it when the ordinal refers to an entity, either concrete or abstract: The last to depart should turn off the lights or I stopped after the fourth martini. If it's being used adverbially it doesn't need and shouldn't have an article: I left last, so I turned off the lights.

But what about this sentence: We approximate the temperature change over the past century to third order/the third order? The word "order" seems to be a noun (if an abstract one) and by the general rule I came up with ought to have a definite article. But it seems to be common for mathematicians just to write "to Nth order" with no article. Is there some grammatical principle that explains this difference of usage? Or is it just an idiomatic usage that doesn't fit the standard pattern and has to be taken as a separate thing? I can't see any rule that obviously fits, and I'm not sure how to search for one.
Subscribe

  • I guess basic is too basic.

    You have to love how slang evolves. In my day, insulting someone was dissing someone from the word disrespect. Now it is throwing shade, especially…

  • The Australian Vernacular... Mate

    Here's an article about Australian slang words, tacked onto a story about an ex-pat USA citizen grappling with what looks & sounds to be the base…

  • translations of the Bhagavad Gita

    An old friend was talking with C and me lately, and she expressed an interest in learning more about the ideas behind yoga, and particularly about…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 5 comments