Anonymous (ulvesang) wrote in linguaphiles,
Anonymous
ulvesang
linguaphiles

Against Formalism

Somewhat related to my last post, can anyone recommend any good references which outline the limitations of formalism and the (current-ish and historical) argument(s) against formalism? Outlining the pros and cons of transformationalist grammar would be nice too.

Please note that the person reading this is linguistically-educated almost exclusively in formal linguistics-- though not all of it Chomskian.

[CP [IP [VP [V' thank [NP you]] [ADVP very [ADV' much]]]]]
Tags: linguistics
Subscribe

  • UDDER and WATER

    To the memory of Vladislav Illich-Svitych. This is just to bring attention to something very ‘Nostratic’ (far beyond ‘Indo-European’ languages —…

  • Three one-hundredths of a second

    (Somewhat prompted by watching the Olympics.) Why is that silly redundancy there in "three one-hundredths of a second"? Nobody says "two one-thirds…

  • Word 'Climax'. A note for aspiring etymologists.

    The English word climax has two seemingly incompatible meanings of "climax" and "orgasm". Yet, we should not forget that the word has not only a…

  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 3 comments